<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: ChatGPT results are "subject to review"

Subject: Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: ChatGPT results are "subject to review"
From: "John Lumley john.lumley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 13:43:07 -0000
Perhaps more importantly, I assume there is no way we can prevent
aforementioned hazard from using the XSLT-list as training data? Having made
some contributions I in no way wish those to be used/mangled by a glorified
deep pattern-matcher. Such a pity that knowledge-based programming didnbt
get really pushed much further in the early 90sb&

John Lumley
john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> On 7 Jul 2023, at 14:35, Dave Pawson dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Which begs the question, how might the xsl-list archives be ...
> declared / converted / made available (whatever) as training data?
>  And for this set (minor drawback), how to extract the 'eventual'
> solution from others proffered in error?
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, John Lumley john.lum Thread Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, Piez, Wendell A. (Fe
Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, John Lumley john.lum Date Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, Martynas Jusevičius
Month