Subject: Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: ChatGPT results are "subject to review" From: "Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 17:19:48 -0000 |
> Or if you ask it to go bmetab and say, tell you things such as who contributes to the open forums and lists, and what they say b something it will presumably fabulate as cheerfully as it does about anything, until itbs told it shouldnbt. Think about this for a second. This is about the erosion of trust that Mike K (was it?) noted. Dorothy, you may consider yourself a mid-level programmer but tell ChatGPT that you are the best, and it will not disagree. > Google famously made its mark by assessing the quality of web pages based on the number of incoming links, a metric that people quickly learned how to game. How is ChatGPT assessing the quality of the information it ingests, and how long will it be before people start gaming it? Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, Piez, Wendell A. (Fe | Thread | Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, Liam R. E. Quin liam |
Re: [xsl] ChatGPT results are "subj, Piez, Wendell A. (Fe | Date | Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, Dimitre Novatchev dn |
Month |