|
Subject: Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: ChatGPT results are "subject to review" From: "Liam R. E. Quin liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2023 03:26:35 -0000 |
On Fri, 2023-07-07 at 17:20 +0000, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > How is ChatGPT assessing the quality of the information it ingests, > and how long will it be before people start gaming it? They are already gaming it. Search for "prompt injection" for one aspect. For another - i hear that chatGPT kept making references toa non-existent Python module in generated code, so someone created such a module and stuffed it with malware... I did consider making a distributed Wrong-o-pedia, full of bad answers, for the sole purpose of ruining chat-gpt :) -- Liam Quin,B https://www.delightfulcomputing.com/ Available for XML/Document/Information Architecture/XSLT/ XSL/XQuery/Web/Text Processing/A11Y training, work & consulting. Barefoot Web-slave, antique illustrations: B http://www.fromoldbooks.org
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Thread | Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, Martynas Jusevičius |
| Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, Dimitre Novatchev dn | Date | [no subject], Unknown |
| Month |