Subject: Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: ChatGPT results are "subject to review" From: "Michael Kay michaelkay90@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 14:39:20 -0000 |
> Michael, I wonder what "nasty accidents" you are thinking of -- some XSLTs used in particular industries with real-world safety issues? I came across an example where XSLT was being used to display the results of a clinical study. Anomalous results were supposed to be shown in red. That was controlled by a boolean test such as (@value > @threshold). In XSLT 1.0 that did a numeric comparison, which was correct, but in XSLT 2.0 it did a string comparison, and failed to highlight the anomaly. And they didn't have good enough tests to spot it, so they went live with the bug. That's certainly a potential safety issue. Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, John Lumley john.lum | Thread | Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, Michael Kay michaelk |
Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, Martynas Jusevičius | Date | Re: [xsl] bad code Re: Subject: Cha, Michael Kay michaelk |
Month |