Subject: Re: [stella] DASM news From: "Andrew Davie" <atari2600@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:54:55 +1100 |
> One problem is, that AFAIK we still do not have a 100% reliable color emulation. So before > we call something eg. PURPLE_BLUE we should make sure, that it is not just the color that is shown in the favouritve emulator but on the real TV. Any volunteers? That's not a problem, because if the programmer is using the conceptual names, he won't care if the *actual* colour assigned to "BLUE" changes slightly as we get a better idea of what "BLUE" actually *is*. That's my take on it, anyway. If I use "BLUE" as my colour, then I don't care what it displays, as long as it's as close to blue as possible, and if a 'better' blue comes along later, that's fine - I don't have to change my code. I don't think lack of exact colours should stop us making a first pass at colour naming. Maybe instead, we could use some macro (RGB) where you could give your desired colour, and the macro would return the closest match, given the RGB value and the system (PAL/NTSC). That way, 'blue' could be macro'd to RGB(0,0,255) which would in turn be revectored to an actual colour value. Cheers A ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] DASM news, Thomas Jentzsch | Thread | Re: [stella] DASM news, Adam Thornton |
Aw: Re: Re: [stella] DASM news, cybergoth | Date | Re: [stella] DASM news, Thomas Jentzsch |
Month |