Subject: RE: [stella] Archives, inactivity and the From: "Lee Fastenau" <stella@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:42:54 -0500 |
> "Thomas Jentzsch" <tjentzsch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Russ wrote: > >> In the future, I encourage any and all of you to continue to post to > >> Stellalist even if an alternate list is available. > > > So, should we continue the discussion about moving? Maybe a backup list? > > If you'll recall the last time this all came up and I responded, I > heartily encouraged a backup archive instead of a new list. I still > stand by this, because most/all of the posts that I've been told were > lost were not the fault of Biglist as far as I could tell. It seems, > to me, to be very reliable in that regard. Russ, thanks for working with Biglist to get the archive up. A backup archive is probably a good idea (make life easier if Biglist upgrades their hardware again). The distribution list itself always seemed to work fine with only the occasional hiccup, probably due to isolated network problems more than anything else. It'll be nice to keep up with these posts at work again. :) Naturally, only during breaks and lunch! -Lee Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] Archives, inactivity a, David Galloway | Thread | Re: [stella] New list: Update, Glenn Saunders |
Re: [stella] New list: Update, Adam Wozniak | Date | Re: [stella] Archives, inactivity a, David Galloway |
Month |