Subject: re: [stella] DASM Wish List From: "Lee Fastenau" <stella@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:35:51 -0400 |
> From: "C. Bond" <cbond@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > It occurred to me that 'anonymous' labels might be a good > addition to DASM. These > are sometimes called MASM-style local labels, but they are > not just local, they are > totally nameless. The syntax used is: > > @@ JMP NXT > SCAN LDA NUM ; ordinary label > CMP #3 > BCS @B ; branch to previous anonymous label > JMP ONE > CMP #2 > BNE @F ; branch to next anonymous label > JMP TWO > @@ CMP #3 I like it. I dislike copying loops and having to enumerate the labels... or having labels that make sense in one context, but when copied elsewhere lose their meaning or become confusing. (Like seeing a .loop3 label copied from elsewhere when there's no .loop1 or .loop2 to be found nearby.) What's the downside? -Lee Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[stella] DASM Wish List, C. Bond | Thread | re: [stella] DASM Wish List, mathys66 |
[stella] DASM Wish List, C. Bond | Date | re: [stella] DASM Wish List, mathys66 |
Month |