RE: [xsl] Comment about XSLT Complier?

Subject: RE: [xsl] Comment about XSLT Complier?
From: "Tim Watts" <timw@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:43:14 +1100
If you would like to see some more benchmark tests there are results at

Xalan C and Sablotron are the two C++ XSLT Parsers tested there and the
others are Java

Tim Watts

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Xu, Xiaocun
Sent: Friday, 16 March 2001 12:50 AM
To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [xsl] Comment about XSLT Complier?

> > There are benchmarks on the web which show the XSLTC to be a good
> > performer.
> Oh good! Could you point me at a URL for these benchmarks?
> I've seen figures
> for other XSLT processors but not for XSLTC.

Check out, it has the best
collection of XSLT processors being benchmarked.  From their result, XSLTC
has one of the best in performance.  But be aware of the warning:

The figures for non-conformant engines are likely to be skewed by the fact
that they are non-conformant. In this test the non-conformant engines are
Sun XSLTC and Sabletron. The other engines are either conformant or near
enough that it makes little difference to these tests.

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread