Subject: Re: MIF backend and Images: a solution? From: Chris Maden <crism@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 17:18:55 -0400 (EDT) |
[Karl Critz] > One of the known bugs in the backend (from mif.htm) is the fact that > it renders images in a 1x1 frame and overlaps them over nearby > paragraphs. The authors claim in the documentation that this is > because they need to know the size of the image in order to set the > frame size and would rather not use external software to get this > information. The stylesheet designer *could* get the size information. My custom tagged-MIF-maker parses the EPS graphic for the BoundingBox, and sets the size of the frame accordingly. Obviously, this wouldn't work quite as well for binary graphic formats (at least not from inside DSSSL). -Chris -- <!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN"> <!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN" "<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487 <USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek> DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
MIF backend and Images: a solution?, Karl Critz | Thread | JadeTeX documentation? TOC?, John W. Shipman |
MIF backend and Images: a solution?, Karl Critz | Date | Re: Jade 1.2 and glibc?, Jean-Baptiste |
Month |