Subject: Re: Jade 1.2 and glibc? From: Jean-Baptiste <jbnivoit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 13:26:00 -0400 |
Ziemek Borowski wrote: > > Is anybody try to compile jade (especially 1_2 version) > with glibc 2.1 (excactly 2.0.94) on Linux? > > Its confict with /usr/include/signal.h (with type sig_atomic_t). > in glibc 2.0.7 is simillary but no so critical (compilation is possible, > but I received warnnings: > from Parser.h:23, > from parseCommon.cxx:5: > /usr/include/signal.h:39: warning: abstract declarator used as declaration > (and so on). That sometimes happens when your headers try to define the 'bool' type, which is a C++ base type... jb. DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Jade 1.2 and glibc?, Ziemek Borowski | Thread | Re: Jade 1.2 and glibc?, Adam P. Harris |
Re: MIF backend and Images: a solut, Chris Maden | Date | JadeTeX documentation? TOC?, John W. Shipman |
Month |