Re: Jade 1.2 and glibc?

Subject: Re: Jade 1.2 and glibc?
From: Jean-Baptiste <jbnivoit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 13:26:00 -0400
Ziemek Borowski wrote:
> 
> Is anybody try to compile jade (especially 1_2 version)
> with glibc 2.1 (excactly  2.0.94) on Linux?
> 
> Its confict with /usr/include/signal.h (with type sig_atomic_t).
> in glibc 2.0.7 is simillary but no so critical (compilation is possible,
> but  I received warnnings:
>                  from Parser.h:23,
>                  from parseCommon.cxx:5:
> /usr/include/signal.h:39: warning: abstract declarator used as declaration
> (and so on).
That sometimes happens when your headers try to define the 'bool' type,
which is a C++ base type...

	jb.


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


Current Thread
  • Jade 1.2 and glibc?
    • Ziemek Borowski - from mail1.ability.netby web4-1.ability.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA03693Fri, 25 Sep 1998 09:00:52 -0400 (EDT)
      • Jean-Baptiste - from mail1.ability.netby web4-1.ability.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA28938Fri, 25 Sep 1998 19:13:00 -0400 (EDT) <=
      • Adam P. Harris - from mail1.ability.netby web4-1.ability.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA00610Sat, 26 Sep 1998 17:56:21 -0400 (EDT)
        • Ziemek Borowski - from mail1.ability.netby web4-1.ability.net (8.8.5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA01454Mon, 28 Sep 1998 08:24:40 -0400 (EDT)