Subject: Re: Jade 1.2 and glibc? From: apharris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Adam P. Harris) Date: 26 Sep 1998 18:01:55 -0400 |
Ziemek Borowski <ziembor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Is anybody try to compile jade (especially 1_2 version) > with glibc 2.1 (excactly 2.0.94) on Linux? > > Its confict with /usr/include/signal.h (with type sig_atomic_t). > in glibc 2.0.7 is simillary but no so critical (compilation is possible, > but I received warnnings: > from Parser.h:23, > from parseCommon.cxx:5: > /usr/include/signal.h:39: warning: abstract declarator used as declaration > (and so on). > > Any ideas? Get that patch from either <URL:http://www.sgmltools.org/jade.html> or <URL:http://master.debian.org/~aph/jade-1.2-patch1.diff.gz>. That will fix that problem and others. .....A. P. Harris...apharris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<URL:http://www.onShore.com/> DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Jade 1.2 and glibc?, Jean-Baptiste | Thread | Re: Jade 1.2 and glibc?, Ziemek Borowski |
Re: Jade 1.2 available, Adam P. Harris | Date | Re: Jade 1.2 and JadeTeX, Steve Tinney |
Month |