Subject: Re: Jade and TeX From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 11:30:03 +0100 (BST) |
> I wouldn't embed this much. I would use DSSSL for links, and TeX for > things I would usually put between $ ... $ and \[ \] in um, so how would you do a displayed equation? > for many other people, LaTeX offers a pretty terrible markup language well, i am not sure i agree, but never mind. an old colleague of mind once tried to write a DTD describing LaTeX, and nearly succeeeded :-} > replacement to people that I know. But if they can't use TeX commands > then they (or I) must develop a DTD, write a stylesheet, write shortrefs > and then train them! how will you train them to do the rest of the stuff? tables? once they are working in a new environment writing SGML, or converting to it, I have a feeling its _more_ confusing to embed TeX occasionally. if you can experiment a bit and see what happens when you do $a+b+c$ in the middle of the DSSSL output, I can start working on implementing \beginrawTeX ... \endrawTeX, with appropriate protection. It may just work all the time by coincidence anyway sebastian
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Jade and TeX, Paul Prescod | Thread | "aunt" attributes, John Fieber |
Re: Jade and TeX, Paul Prescod | Date | Jade and notations, David Megginson |
Month |