Re: SGML to HTML with jade?

[Norman Walsh <norm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I am glad that the DocBook3 printing style sheet is progressing as I 
> want to use it in the future with LaTeX as the backend. I will try to 
> contribute to it. One point, the recent modularisation of the style sheet
> has made it harder to understand (IMHO) because now it's less convenient to 
> browse and locate items of interest.

That's definitely an issue.  I needed modularity so that I could redefine
some definitions for specific projects without having to copy the whole
stylesheet.  However, it's pretty clear that I don't fully grok the
ramifications of multiple style-specifications, and perhaps I went to
far in my zeal for modularity.  I could merge things back together into
fewer pieces, certainly.

Members of the list, what say you?  

--norm



 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist