Subject: Re: SGML to HTML with jade? From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 13:07:14 +0100 (BST) |
> stylesheet. However, it's pretty clear that I don't fully grok the > ramifications of multiple style-specifications, and perhaps I went to > far in my zeal for modularity. I could merge things back together into > fewer pieces, certainly. > > Members of the list, what say you? I am a big fan of modularity. Its clearly necessary and desirable in the long run, so I think that if you have the time you should perform the necessary grokking earlier rather than later. I for one am glad this has come up now as it explains some oddities in my own setup... Sebastian PS if `performing a grok' is a bastardization, apologies. the original book was such a pile of trash, however, who cares? DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: SGML to HTML with jade?, Norman Walsh | Thread | Re: SGML to HTML with jade?, Paul Prescod |
Re: SGML to HTML with jade?, Norman Walsh | Date | Re: DSSSL query feature, David Megginson |
Month |