Subject: Re: Paragraph breaks From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 08:55:12 -0400 |
James Robertson wrote: > So in the case of TeX, for example, wouldn't it be easier to use this > mechanism, instead of trying to generate the index directly? Yes and no. Yes, it would be easier. No, I'm not yet convinced that an "index entry" flow object would be quite appropriate. The problem is that it is at a totally different semantic level than all of the other flow objects. All of the other flow objects are right at the formatting level, not at the "what does this do structurally" level. I think that another level of DSSSL flow objects would be useful: "section", "list-item", "index entry", "table of contents entry", "footnote" etc. These flow objects would be easier to create and use and would work as well in HTML as they do in print. But I think that they should be developed as a group, rather than individually. You might think that you could develop them just as procedures, but I have found that to be *very* difficult -- perhaps impossible, if you want to do it "right". Paul Prescod DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Paragraph breaks, James Robertson | Thread | Re: Paragraph breaks, Matthias Clasen |
Re: Paragraph breaks, Duncan Hothersall | Date | Re: Paragraph breaks, Matthias Clasen |
Month |