Subject: Re: XSL and DSSSL-O From: Jon.Bosak@xxxxxxxxxxx (Jon Bosak) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 15:42:48 -0700 |
[Bob DuCharme:] | XSL seems to serve many of the purposes of DSSSL-O; what does it mean | for the future of DSSSL-O? I only read this list in digest form, so I don't know yet what others may have said about this. My initial take on XSL is that it accomplishes the purposes of dsssl-o in a form that many will find easier to learn. It also promises a clean division between the declarative and programmatic parts of a style sheet that should make it much easier to construct user-friendly style editors. As the de facto editor of the dsssl-o spec, I can testify that it is an exercise in pure pragmatism. If XSL can deliver on its promise to provide an open standard that implements dsssl-o functionality and fosters wide commercial deployment, then I for one will be happy to retire the specification. Jon DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
XSL and DSSSL-O, DuCharme, Robert | Thread | RE: XSL and DSSSL-O, James K. Tauber |
Jade 1.0 Unix binaries, Ingo Macherius | Date | RE: XSL and DSSSL-O, James K. Tauber |
Month |