Subject: RE: XSL and DSSSL-O From: "James K. Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 21:36:38 -0700 |
> XSL seems to serve many of the purposes of DSSSL-O; what does it mean > for the future of DSSSL-O? If DSSSL is revised to be a superset of XSL (as I will be encouraging Australia to support) then I would see XSL as being, in essence, DSSSL-O. James -- James K. Tauber / jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx Perth, Western Australia XML Pages: http://www.jtauber.com/xml/ > [Bob DuCharme:] > > > I only read this list in digest form, so I don't know yet what others > may have said about this. > > My initial take on XSL is that it accomplishes the purposes of dsssl-o > in a form that many will find easier to learn. It also promises a > clean division between the declarative and programmatic parts of a > style sheet that should make it much easier to construct user-friendly > style editors. As the de facto editor of the dsssl-o spec, I can > testify that it is an exercise in pure pragmatism. If XSL can deliver > on its promise to provide an open standard that implements dsssl-o > functionality and fosters wide commercial deployment, then I for one > will be happy to retire the specification. > > Jon > > DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL and DSSSL-O, Jon Bosak | Thread | RE: XSL and DSSSL-O, Frank Christoph |
Re: XSL and DSSSL-O, Jon Bosak | Date | Jade charsets question., Valeriy E. Ushakov |
Month |