Subject: Re: DSSSL capabilities - was RE: TOC problem with HTML32 dsssl From: Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxx> Date: 17 Oct 1997 17:27:14 +0100 |
>>>>> "Henry" == Henry S Thompson <ht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Henry> at the glyph level by treating your contractions as ligatures Henry> (but Jade doesn't support this yet, I don't think.) If you can express it as a ligature problem it should yield to the TeX backend with a suitable font. It sounds like the sort of thing that should exist, but isn't apparent in the archive. Sebastian? >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Paul> Finally, DSSSL proper has an optional "regex" feature that Paul> would allow you to do these kinds search and replaces. I don't Paul> know when or if Jade will support it If necessary, one could presumably get similar functionality strightforwardly in the expression language with the standard sort of parser-building functions. _Efficient_ regexps would be a different matter. I agree this is really a job for the backend or thereafter. Paul> I would suggest that the simplest thing for you to do is use Paul> Python, Perl or Awk on the output of Jade. or, tastefully, in an appropriate Scheme system. DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: DSSSL capabilities - was RE: TO, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: DSSSL capabilities - was RE: TO, Sebastian Rahtz |
Re: DSSSL capabilities - was RE: TO, Chris Maden | Date | Re: DSSSL capabilities - was RE: TO, Paul Prescod |
Month |