Subject: Re: Keep-together tables and empty cells From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 25 Dec 1997 11:58:12 +0700 |
A better way to spare the people the irritation that you have had would be to submit a proper bug report so that I can fix it in the next release. >From the Jade docs: Please report bugs by email to me, jjc@xxxxxxxxxxx Do not post them to comp.text.sgml nor to the sp-prog mailing list nor to the DSSSList mailing list. ... The most important thing in reporting a bug is to include a complete set of files on which I can run jade and reproduce the problem. Include all DTDs that you use, whether or not they are standard. Also tell me what command line I should use, and what is incorrect about the behaviour of jade. If the files are large package them up as a tar or zip file and upload them to ftp://ftp.jclark.com/incoming. Richard Light wrote: > > Hi, > > So that others may be spared the irritation we have recently had ... > > If you want tables to stay together (i.e. not break across page > boundaries), beware of empty cells. In the RTF backend, at any rate, if > you create a table-cell for an element that has no content, you end up > with a 'rogue' paragraph in that cell which doesn't have (Word's) 'keep > with next' flag set. > > I got round this problem by simply appending a space to all table cells > after (process-children) to ensure they had some content, but I'm sure > there are cleverer ways, which check that an element has no data content > before taking such intrusive action! DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Keep-together tables and empty cell, Richard Light | Thread | Re: Keep-together tables and empty , Richard Light |
Re: DSSSL deserted - XSL Mailing Li, Jon Bosak | Date | Re: starts-row? attribute in make t, James Clark |
Month |