Subject: RE: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF? From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:22:36 +0000 (GMT) |
Josep Vela writes: > You may obtain pdf from SGML using a DSSSL that generates Lout. Lout is > simple than TeX. > A Lout driver for jade will be better, but nobody's perfect. B-) If you mean to use the DSSSL direct formatting objects to write raw Lout, as the Docbook HTML does, you lose half the advantages of DSSSL. If you write a Lout backend to Jade, you meet all the same problems as the TeX backend has. The fact that Lout probably *is* simpler than TeX is very likely to be unimportant. I to agree that a neutral page formatter embedded in Jade would be fun, and very useful. But a distinctly non-trivial task. Sebastian DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF, Josep Vela | Thread | Re: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF, Joerg F. Wittenberge |
RE: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF, Avi Kivity | Date | Re: Future of DSSSL: What about PDF, Matthias Clasen |
Month |