Subject: Re: To James - The DSSSL bazaar and the cathedral From: "admin" <admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 11:08:00 EST |
Hi: Does DSSSL offer options for linking? Thanks, Tom ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 11:00:59 -0400 >Hi James, > >As you noticed, several people in the DSSSL community are ready to build a >common site or web of sites and resources about DSSSL. They are also ready >to offer some of their precious time to organize the community production, >promote DSSSL, experiment with it, improve it, make it grow, make it more >useful. > >Actually there are some problems: >a) the community adds or modify things in Jade. This is the most positive >thing we can envision, it means that now Baby Jade has more than one parent >to care of its growth :-). The problem is that we need a mechanism for patch >posting, modification posting, distribution, tests, etc. Feedback to >producers, track record of patches and links to producers, etc... >b) Also, the DSSSL community stopped selling DSSSL to the world. We need to >improve this facet. If we can at least have some articles telling that DSSSL >can _be used_ for XML _and_ SGML. This is an improvement on the actual >situation and a better world for the users (freedom of choice and freedom >based on knowing the alternatives or said from a pragmatic perspective: the >right tool for the right job) >a) We need a common site on which the patch could be posted and a list of >volunteers that can validate these patches. People would know that these >volunteers would answer to producers, take care of the integration and do >the follow up for the tests. >b) We need more content about DSSSL, text, articles, tutorials, etc... We >also need one or more than one site that organize this content. >c) We need new experiments with DSSSL for new ISO standards like for >instance topic maps or for W3C future be standards like RDF. Example with >document types like ATA 100 (SGML document type for the aviation industry) >d) We need documents that make bridges or compare to other style sheet >languages like for instance CSS or XSL. > >Simply said, we need to bring some life to DSSSL > >Situation: >a) several people concerned with the DSSSL future expressed their will to >help build a community site or a web of sites >b) Several help proposal are on the table. The DSSSL community has several >voluntaries who wants to see baby Jade grow to its next life stage and >refuses to see it dying because of a lack of care. This, mainly because the >DSSSL community uses this tool for day to day real productive activities. >c) we have several volunteer to do some of the Job. > >Proposals: >a) a CVS site >b) a site or Web of site about DSSSL resources. >c) a list of people who take care of some tasks: integration, builds, tests. > > >Suddenly, DSSSL has the opportunity to build its own bazaar. So let this >bazaar build its own cathedral. (to retake some well known metaphor) > >James, Do you have any thoughts on this? Any suggestions? For practical >matters, do have in mind any process? > >Regards >Didier PH Martin >mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >http://www.netfolder.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: To James - The DSSSL bazaar and, Adam Di Carlo | Thread | RE: To James - The DSSSL bazaar and, Didier PH Martin |
To James - The DSSSL bazaar and the, Didier PH Martin | Date | About articles on DSSSL usage, Didier PH Martin |
Month |