Subject: RE: Jade/DSSSL future From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 10:56:47 -0400 |
Hi Sebastian, I cannot speak for Explorer (Microsoft IE) but for Mozilla the probability of having XSLT before the end of the year is very high. We are working on this. The probability to have XSLFO is very very low. We are not working on it. This is too much work to reconcile CSS objects and XSLFO objects. Because XSLT can manipulate CSS object. We don't put any effort on XSLFO. regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Sebastian Rahtz Sent: Saturday, May 29, 1999 6:29 AM To: dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Jade/DSSSL future Adam Di Carlo writes: > >From a cynic's standpoint, XSL-FO is still 2 years off, and definately > there's no guarantee it itself won't hit critical implementation flaws > and problems. The fact that big corporations are shoveling money into > it helps but doesn't guarantee success. Anyhow, I'm not trying to I don't buy this "2 years" thing. either we'll see plausible XSL FO-based printing by Christmas, or never. If one cannot whip up a thing that takes FOs and runs them through, say, TeX within a few months of the next release of XSL, then it'll be because its fatally flawed. That'll buy you printing of XML files via a single XSL route. I dont say we'll see *browsers* implementing FO interpretation so fast, but maybe Sebastian DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Jade/DSSSL future, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | RE: Jade/DSSSL future, Sebastian Rahtz |
Re: Jade/DSSSL future, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | RE: Jade/DSSSL future, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |