Subject: Re: Jade/DSSSL future From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 11:32:00 +0100 (BST) |
Adam Di Carlo writes: > > So, dare I suggest it, what would it take to adapt this > > intermediate level of functionality into a new (set of, I'd guess) > > DSSSL FOs that would fall between simple-page-sequence and the full > > page-sequence? > > I would think that the way to do this is to "pretend" to implement > page-sequence, but really only implement a subset (but a large subset > than the simple-page-sequence offers). I'd have to study the spec to yes, I buy that approach. but the implementation in a backend is still doing to be horrid ... > >From Sebastian's other replies, I would expect that perhaps a > completely new TeX backend might be called for, one which just spits > out raw TeX commands... yes. starting from the RTF backend one might think about reusing an awful lot of James' code in there sebastian DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Jade/DSSSL future, Adam Di Carlo | Thread | RE: Jade/DSSSL future, Didier PH Martin |
Re: Jade/DSSSL future, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | RE: Jade/DSSSL future, Didier PH Martin |
Month |