Subject: Re: html to dsssl ? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 15:39:17 +0100 (BST) |
> If JadeTex would have its output directly interpretable with the > IBM tex plug-in we would have for a XML document: No chance of that:-) But why is having the tex interpreted by techexplorer easier than having it interpretted by pdftex? You don't have to _look_ out the output from the tex backend (modulo fixing bugs of course) you just stuff the output from jade straight into pdftex and then into acrobat. I don't see why that is harder than using techexplorer. > What we gained, simply ease of use. ? David DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: html to dsssl ?, Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: html to dsssl ?, Didier PH Martin |
RE: html to dsssl ?, Didier PH Martin | Date | Transformation: data to attr val., Maltby, David G |
Month |