Subject: Re: emitting comments From: Matthias Clasen <clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 22:37:53 +0200 |
> > Yes, you can, but what has never really been clear to me was _why_ dsssl > was defined as an sgml application rather than a lisp-ish one. dsssl is definitively more lisp-ish than xsl... > I know that as defined some of the top level forms require SGML notation > But would it have been impossible for those to have used lisp syntax > too? What was the overriding reason for having dsssl as an sgml > architecture at all? The ability to format dsssl style-sheets using dsssl ? -- Matthias Clasen, Tel. 0761/203-5606 Email: clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mathematisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: emitting comments, Carlos Villegas | Thread | RE: emitting comments, Frank A. Christoph |
SGML and LISP in DSSSL (was: RE: em, Mason, James David ( | Date | Bug fix for the style-sheet DTD., Didier PH Martin |
Month |