<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/OpenJade] g++ 2.95 C++ portability problems

Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/OpenJade] g++ 2.95 C++ portability problems
From: Matthias Clasen <clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 23:17:42 +0200
> I'm no gcc expert, but looking at the docs I see a -frepo flag which seems
> to allow you to get rid of the _inst files completely. Surely that would be
> better? Or is there a catch?
> 

I don't know. I want to test this soon. The only thing to keep in mind
is that you have to change include/config.h to not define SP_MANUAL_INST
for gcc anymore. And you have to remove -fno-implicit-templates from
CXXFLAGS in Makefile.comm.

-- 
Matthias Clasen, 
Tel. 0761/203-5606
Email: clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mathematisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
RE: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/Ope, Avi Kivity Thread Re: [PATCH] 2nd patch Re: [Jade/Ope, Adam Di Carlo
About usability, Didier PH Martin Date RE: About OpenJade and Debian, Didier PH Martin
Month