Subject: Re: [Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>] Re: <footnote> in RTF-95 From: Norman Walsh <ndw@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 09:46:49 -0400 |
/ Adam Di Carlo <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> was heard to say: | Consider this, I guess, an OpenJade feature request. Anyone have any | more knowledge of this? One possible solution (which may have already been implemented in OpenJade) is to provide the equivalent of (make formatting-instruction) in the RTF backend. Then you could slam in whatever necessary RTF magic is needed. Of course, then there has to be a way of testing whether or not OpenJade is the current processing environment in a way that will work in James' last Jade release... | From: Norman Walsh <ndw@xxxxxxxxxx> | Subject: Re: <footnote> in RTF-95 | To: sgml-tools@xxxxxxxxxx | Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 13:54:42 -0400 | X-Sent: 4 days, 19 hours, 49 minutes, 58 seconds ago | Reply-To: sgml-tools@xxxxxxxxxx | | / "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> was heard to say: | | With style sheets 1.42 <fotnote>s become endnotes in RTF-95, just | | like in HTML. But Word has real footnotes, so why not use them? Is it | | a restriction of JADE? | | Yes. I've forgotten the details, but apparently Jade would have to | generate some particular bit of RTF that the current backend doesn't | support. I have a hazy recollection that the problem involves hidden | text or nested paragraphs or some combination of the two. [...] | -- | .....Adam Di Carlo....adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<URL:http://www.onShore.com/> Cheers, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@xxxxxxxxxx> | All things are contingent. And http://nwalsh.com/ | there is chaos.--Spalding Gray DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>] Re:, Adam Di Carlo | Thread | Re: [Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>], Peter Nilsson |
Re: langauges how?, Holger Klawitter | Date | RE: How looks a rule?, Peter Nilsson |
Month |