Subject: Re: Formatting_the_result From: Brandon Ibach <bibach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 16:20:34 -0500 |
Quoting G. Ken Holman <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > My apologies ... I thought you were advocating moving the newlines to after > the tags since I had read posts regarding "pretty printing" the result of > transformation. > I believe I used that phrase in my initial post, but it was to say that we *shouldn't* put one into OpenJade's SGML backend. :) > Having a very very long line length with all the markup and no new lines > (if there were none in the data) may not be attractive to users either. > True, but I guess I'd just like to give the user the option to *not* have OpenJade try to solve that problem. That way, the user can provide their own solution to the problem. > Sorry I misread your intent. > No problem. Sorry if I came across as "cranky" about it. :) -Brandon :) DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Formatting_the_result, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: Formatting_the_result, Russell Steven Shawn |
RE: Formatting_the_result, G. Ken Holman | Date | Re: Formatting_the_result, Russell Steven Shawn |
Month |