AW: OpenJade behaves differently than Jade

[Roland Schopf <Roland.Schopf@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: AW: OpenJade behaves differently than Jade

seems to be the same problem described in my previous mail - thats's why the docbook table style sheet fail.
For me this seems to be a bug or it is hopefully configurable?

Regards
Roland
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Schopf                   Sema Group GmbH
Carl-Zeiss-Ring 6               Phone:   +49 89 996524-55
85737 Ismaning                  Fax:     +49 89 996524-44
GERMANY                 E-Mail:roland.schopf@xxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von:    Christof Drescher [SMTP:drescher@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet am:    Freitag, 10. März 2000 14:35
An:     dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff:        OpenJade behaves differently than Jade

Hi!

As a poor Win95 user, I just came to test OpenJade 1.3. I found a different
behavior towards Jade 1.2, which I think is a little weird:

Before all real numbers were using a dot as a delimiter, e.g. (* 1.2 14pt)
Now, OpenJade issues errors saying "this is not a number", and I must use a
comma, such as (* 1,2 14pt)

But for length-specs, this is not the case; OpenJade issues an error if I
state (* 1,2 13,5pt), and the correct spelling is (weird enough:)

(* 1,2 13.5pt)

Bug or feature? Or configurable?

Christof Drescher
Pro Image GbR, Marburg, Germany




 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist