Subject: Re: (dsssl) [OT] Tale of woe (was: Practical Bibliography question) From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 09:45:04 +0100 |
Trent Shipley writes: > I also wrote to computer support (CCIT) at the UofA. One person wrote back > saying she knew of no XML->XSLT or DSSSL expertise at CCIT and said that I > ought to just use LaTeX. Based on this advice I bought Kopka and Daly's _A > Guide to LaTeX and concluded that LaTeX was a very viable option. > Nevertheless, SGML|XML + a stylesheet would be more optimal provided it would > work. I am not sure why, actually. The LaTeX route is much more mature, and if you want to do is write your thesis, a safer short-term bet. > get from XSLT to PostScript without going through FO and nobody I talked to > knew if there was a mature XSL-FO to TeX, DVI, or PS engine available for > free or reasonable cost. there are no "mature" XSL FO engines, but then again I do not personally regard the only DSSSL engine ((open)jade) as "mature" either...! sebastian DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
(dsssl) [OT] Tale of woe (was: Prac, Trent Shipley | Thread | Re: (dsssl) Practical Bibliography , Trent Shipley |
Re: (dsssl) Practical Bibliography , Markus Hoenicka | Date | Re: (dsssl) Practical Bibliography , Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |