Subject: RE: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:22:23 -0500 |
Hi Brandon, The notes are back online now. You can check them at: http:www.netfolder.com/DSSSL. I'll try to get the other notes and them as well on the site. Obviously, OpenJade may benefit the most from a separation of the groove engine from the DSSSL engine. Since OpenJade is implemented in C++, XPCOM is a good candidate. This would imply some modification to the actual classes inheritance. So instead of inheriting from the groove class we would instead use a separate XPCOM groove engine. This would allow, to have DSSSL to sit on top of different engine either with permanence or transient grooves. Actually, the Openjade's implementation is based on a transient groove. cheers Didier PH Martin. DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL, Didier PH Martin | Thread | Re: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL, Jean-Marie Kubek |
Re: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | RE: (dsssl) Re: The Future of DSSSL, Didier PH Martin |
Month |