Subject: Re: (dsssl) The Future of DSSSL: Concrete proposals From: "Paul Tyson" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:35:10 -0800 |
Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Friday, January 04, 2002 8:40 AM > does anyone still believe that HyTime will ever come into meaningful > use? Yes, but it is not wise to speak it out loud because it is only a distraction at this point. When groves are understood better, and there are more grove processors, and there is a fully functional DSSSL engine, HyTime will come into meaningful use. It is not unusual for theory to get ahead of technology. The theory of holography was developed in the late 1940s, but useful holographs had to await the development of lasers 20 years later. But see, I myself am getting distracted from the main point. The most important task right now is building a complete DSSSL engine. Later, --Paul Paul Tyson, Principal Consultant Precision Documents paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://precisiondocuments.com "The art and science of document engineering." DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: (dsssl) The Future of DSSSL: Co, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | (dsssl) OpenJade2002 (was The Futur, Paul Tyson |
Re: (dsssl) The Future of DSSSL: Co, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | (dsssl) OpenJade2002 (was The Futur, Paul Tyson |
Month |