Subject: Re: (dsssl) OpenJade2002 (was The Future of DSSSL: Concrete proposals) From: Trent Shipley <tcshipley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:18:55 -0700 |
Mr. Tyson, I disagree with most of what you say in this letter. However, I want to specifically take issue with your most minor proposal. Instead of OpenJade2002 I would like to propose the project be called Modular OpenJade Objects: OpenJade 2.0 Or *MOJO* for short. > Ken Holman said quite a while ago that the topic of this thread, "The > Future of DSSSL" could be misinterpreted to mean "The Future of the DSSSL > Standard", and that this is not the proper forum for such a discussion. > I've suggested the name "OpenJade2002" as a more politically correct title > for this thread. I would also submit this as a candidate name of this > project, because I think this initiative is substantial enough to deserve a > name that distinguishes it from the existing openjade. > > Thank you, Javier, for your excellent contributions so far, and I look > forward to working with you and the DSSSL community in 2002. > > --Paul > > Paul Tyson, Principal Consultant Precision Documents > paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://precisiondocuments.com > "The art and science of document engineering." > > > > DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
(dsssl) OpenJade2002 (was The Futur, Paul Tyson | Thread | Re: (dsssl) OpenJade2002 (was The F, Ian Castle |
(dsssl) OpenJade2002 (was The Futur, Paul Tyson | Date | Re: (dsssl) OpenJade2002 (was The F, Ian Castle |
Month |