Re: (dsssl) OpenJade2002 (was The Future of DSSSL: Concrete proposals)

Subject: Re: (dsssl) OpenJade2002 (was The Future of DSSSL: Concrete proposals)
From: Trent Shipley <tcshipley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:18:55 -0700
Mr. Tyson,  I disagree with most of what you say in this letter.

However, I want to specifically take issue with your most minor proposal.

Instead of OpenJade2002  I would like to propose the project be called

Modular OpenJade Objects: OpenJade 2.0 

Or *MOJO* for short.

> Ken Holman said quite a while ago that the topic of this thread, "The
> Future of DSSSL" could be misinterpreted to mean "The Future of the DSSSL
> Standard", and that this is not the proper forum for such a discussion.
> I've suggested the name "OpenJade2002" as a more politically correct title
> for this thread.  I would also submit this as a candidate name of this
> project, because I think this initiative is substantial enough to deserve a
> name that distinguishes it from the existing openjade.
> Thank you, Javier, for your excellent contributions so far, and I look
> forward to working with you and the DSSSL community in 2002.
> --Paul
> Paul Tyson, Principal Consultant                   Precision Documents
> paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    
>      "The art and science of document engineering."
>  DSSSList info and archive:

 DSSSList info and archive:

Current Thread