RE: [jats-list] JATS 1.1 request: kwd-group in more locations

Subject: RE: [jats-list] JATS 1.1 request: kwd-group in more locations
From: "Kelly, Laura (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [E]" <kelly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:23:36 -0400
>It would seem better to me to simply add and maintain a generic
>"metadata bundle" element than to push things partway in that
>direction and then want to refactor later.

I think we're already partway in that direction. The fig and table-wrap models
both already allow attrib and permissions. So if we were to bundle them now,
it would be a non-backward compatible change.

I wasn't sold on adding the <kwd-group> to Authoring until I checked out the
article-meta model and saw that <kwd-group> is allowed. Thought I have to say
that I'm still not wholly convinced it's needed, but there is a precedent for
allowing keywords in Authoring. Whether or not publishers actually use those
keywords is another issue entirely.

Laura

________________________________________
From: Wendell Piez [wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 2:12 PM
To: jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [jats-list] JATS 1.1 request: kwd-group in more locations

Hi,

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Kelly, Laura (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [E]
<kelly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
> I'd like to request that the <kwd-group> element be added to additional
locations in the next revision of JATS.
>
> I'd like to see it added to <fig> and <table-wrap> especially, but I suspect
there are additional places that would benefit from it, as well. I
respectfully request that the Working Group consider reviewing the models for
additional places that would be appropriate for <kwd-group>.
>
> I think it should be added in all 3 models.

I wonder if 'fig' and 'table-wrap' (and any other elements?) shouldn't
actually have a 'sec-meta', or something like it.

In NLM 3.0 (Blue) the model for 'sec-meta' is

(contrib-group*, kwd-group*, permissions?)

It would seem better to me to simply add and maintain a generic
"metadata bundle" element than to push things partway in that
direction and then want to refactor later.

Also, I'm not sure this belongs in Authoring, which is supposed to be
lean and mean (isn't it)? Authoring doesn't currently have 'sec-meta'
inside 'sec'.

Cheers,
Wendell

--
Wendell Piez | http://www.wendellpiez.com
XML | XSLT | electronic publishing
Eat Your Vegetables
_____oo_________o_o___ooooo____ooooooo_^

Current Thread