Re: [jats-list] The odd 1.02 year

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [jats-list] The odd 1.02 year

Subject: Re: [jats-list] The odd 1.02 year
From: Kaveh Bazargan <kaveh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:21:11 +0000

Should we not have five digits to avoid a Y10K problem? Think ahead guys. ;-)

--
Kaveh Bazargan
www.river-valley.com | www.river-valley.tv | www.bazargan.org

Current Thread
Re: [jats-list] The odd 1.02 year, (continued) Debbie Lapeyre - 11 Jan 2013 21:47:31 -0000 Alf Eaton - 10 Jan 2013 19:25:41 -0000 Kaveh Bazargan - 10 Jan 2013 19:52:38 -0000 Debbie Lapeyre - 10 Jan 2013 20:06:10 -0000 Message not available Kaveh Bazargan - 10 Jan 2013 20:21:34 -0000 <=

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [jats-list] The odd 1.02 year, Debbie Lapeyre	Thread	[jats-list] Job Posting: Digital Pu, David Seaman
Re: [jats-list] The odd 1.02 year, Debbie Lapeyre	Date	[jats-list] xml:base attributes in , Alf Eaton
	Month