Subject: Re: [jats-list] The odd 1.02 year From: Alf Eaton <eaton.alf@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:25:15 +0000 |
Great, thanks Debbie. I guess "0042" would make sense as an example of how to mark up a pre-1000 year with zero padding, but that's presumably a rarity (and might as well be expressed as "42", anyway). Alf On 10 January 2013 19:10, Debbie Lapeyre <dalapeyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dear Alf-- > > The year "1.02" in Blue, Green, and Pumpkin looks like > a mistake to me. In the 3.0 version of the Tag Libraries > it read "0042", which was deliberate I think, but obscure. > > I have changed it to match the BITS documentation to > be "2012". I'm guessing a badly applied global change > got it. > > Thanks for spotting it! > > > --Debbie > > > -- > ====================================================================== > Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre mailto:dalapeyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com > 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9633 > Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 > Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in XML, XSLT, & SGML > ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[jats-list] JATS updates (was RE: T, Beck, Jeff (NIH/NLM/ | Thread | Re: [jats-list] The odd 1.02 year, Kaveh Bazargan |
[jats-list] The odd 1.02 year, Debbie Lapeyre | Date | Re: [jats-list] The odd 1.02 year, Kaveh Bazargan |
Month |