RE: [jats-list] Funder ids

[Mike Eden <meden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you Laura

Mike Eden





From:   "Randall, Laura (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [E]" <laura.randall@xxxxxxx>
To:     "jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
<jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
Date:   17/09/2013 11:37
Subject:        RE: [jats-list] Funder ids



Hi, Mike.
This topic has been raised in other discussion areas, but I don't believe 
it's been raised on the JATS-List. The request to provide support for the 
funder identifier was actually submitted as a comment to the NISO JATS 
Standing Committee and the Committee has discussed it and decided on  a 
course of action to implement that support.

Since the existing model does not, as you point out, provide natural 
support, I've suggested to others who have inquired that they use a 
combination of <funding-source> and <named-content 
content-type="funder-id">:
<funding-source>Institution Name <named-content content-type="funder-id">
http://dx.doi.org/10.1234/InstitutionName</named-content></funding-source>

I hope that helps.

Best,
Laura

________________________
Laura Randall
lrandall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
NCBI/NLM/NIH

________________________________________
From: Mike Eden [meden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 5:57 AM
To: jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jats-list] Funder ids

Hi,

forgive me if this has already been raised, but how are people capturing
funder identifier needed for FundRef  submissions to CrossRef.

While there is not a specific element or attribute that lend themselves to
this naturally,  I think that it could be "squeezed" into <funding-source>
attribute "source-type".   I'd be interested to know if there is already a
general consensus on this.

Regards

Mike Eden