RE: [jats-list] Funder ids

Subject: RE: [jats-list] Funder ids
From: Evan Owens <eowens@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:04:55 +0000
Here's a sample of what we are planning to do at AIP Publishing.  We are using
two named-content wrappers to ease the migration to future JATS functionality
(institution name and institution identifier):

  <named-content content-type="funder-name">U.S. Department of
<award-id award-type="contract">DE-FC26-07NT43098</award-id>
  <named-content content-type="funder-name">National Science
<award-id award-type="contract">CBET-0318999</award-id>

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Eden [mailto:meden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 6:50 AM
To: jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [jats-list] Funder ids

Thank you Laura

Mike Eden

From:   "Randall, Laura (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [E]" <laura.randall@xxxxxxx>
To:     "jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
Date:   17/09/2013 11:37
Subject:        RE: [jats-list] Funder ids

Hi, Mike.
This topic has been raised in other discussion areas, but I don't believe it's
been raised on the JATS-List. The request to provide support for the funder
identifier was actually submitted as a comment to the NISO JATS Standing
Committee and the Committee has discussed it and decided on  a course of
action to implement that support.

Since the existing model does not, as you point out, provide natural support,
I've suggested to others who have inquired that they use a combination of
<funding-source> and <named-content
<funding-source>Institution Name <named-content content-type="funder-id"></named-content></funding-source>

I hope that helps.


Laura Randall

From: Mike Eden [meden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 5:57 AM
To: jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jats-list] Funder ids


forgive me if this has already been raised, but how are people capturing
funder identifier needed for FundRef  submissions to CrossRef.

While there is not a specific element or attribute that lend themselves to
this naturally,  I think that it could be "squeezed" into <funding-source>
attribute "source-type".   I'd be interested to know if there is already a
general consensus on this.


Mike Eden

Current Thread