Re: [jats-list] access and license indicators

Subject: Re: [jats-list] access and license indicators
From: "Maloney, Christopher (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] maloneyc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 14:19:46 -0000
Hi, I have some questions and some comments.

I'm not quite sure exactly what your tagged example is attempting to convey,
but I'd make the following suggestions regardless:

* Drop the `specific-use="metadata"` attributes -- I don't see that they add
any information; the contents of the <license> elements are always metadata.
* I see that your rights-and-permissions page
(http://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions) mentions that at
least two journals use a CC-BY license. In those cases, I'd suggest that it's
important to use that URI (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) in
the license/@xlink:href directly. This is for machine-readability - so that
bots and such could tell what the license of the article is, and thus maximize
the re-use potential.

So, what does this tag mean?

    <named-content specific-use=bmetadatab
      content-type=bam-start-dateb>2016-06-01</named-content>

Have you seen NISO's recent recommended practice document on this topic?  It's
here:
http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/14226/rp-22-2015_ALI.pdf .

That document provides two new XML elements that might be helpful, and the
latest draft version of JATS (1.1d3) includes these:

* <ali:free_to_read>
(http://jatspan.org/niso/archiving-1.1d3/#p=elem-ali_free_to_read) - this
might be what you're `license-type="public-access"` is attempting to convey
* <ali:license_ref>
(http://jatspan.org/niso/archiving-1.1d3/#p=elem-ali_license_ref) - this can
be used to specify dates, if different licenses apply for different time
periods.

But, if you're stuck using a version of JATS earlier than 1.1d3, then I'd
suggest coming up with a tagging scheme that mimics as closely as possible the
NISO recommendations.

In the JATS-for-reuse group, we have an open issue to address this question,
here: https://github.com/JATS4R/elements/issues/50. We could use this as an
example, and try to come up with best practices for this case, which we'd then
roll into our next iteration of recommendations.


--
Chris Maloney
NIH/NLM/NCBI (Contractor)
Building 45, 4AN36D-12
301-594-2842


"Jennifer McAndrews jmcandre@xxxxxxx<mailto:jmcandre@xxxxxxx>" wrote:

Hello All,

In anticipation of providing our users access to DOE funded articles this
coming autumn, we are working to devise a sample JATS tagging structure that
we can provide to our online hosting group so that they, in turn, can begin
preparation on their end. Because we need to do this sooner rather than later,
we are at present planning to use existing JATS green.  As of right now, our
markup would read:

<license license-type="public-access"
xlink:href="http://publishing.aip.org/authors/rights-and-permissions";
specific-use=bmetadatab>
<license-p>
<named-content specific-use=bmetadatab
content-type=bam-start-dateb>2016-06-01</named-content>
</license-p>
</license>

Ibm curious if anyone else is planning to use existing elements and if so
what that implementation might look like? I worry therebs a more precise or
more elegant means of containing the information inside the xml that Ibm not
considering.

Thanks for any input!
Jennifer


Jennifer McAndrews
Content Technology
AIP Publishing LLC
1305 Walt Whitman Road
Suite 300
Melville, NY 11747-4300
[AIPPublishinglogo]
Tel. +1 516-576-2679
Email: jmcandre@xxxxxxx<mailto:jmcandre@xxxxxxx>

JATS-List info and archive<http://www.mulberrytech.com/JATS/JATS-List/>
EasyUnsubscribe<http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/jats-list/281881> (by
email<mailto:jats-list-unsub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=remove>)

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of image002.jpg]

Current Thread