Subject: [jats-list] BITS: differences between <back> and <book-back> From: "Mike Eden meden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:31:36 -0000 |
Hi I just wondered what the rationale was in not allowing <sec> in <book-back>? Was there a specific reason not to include it or was there no specific reason to include it. I am wondering how to capture data-availability statement in BITS. In JATS I would add as <back><sec content-type="data-availability"> alongside other statements, acknowledgements, references etc. But where I would consider to capture this statement for a whole book in <book-back> there is no child <sec> or sibling of <ack>, <ref-list> etc. Am I looking at this right? Helpful comments please Mike Eden Cambridge University Press is the publishing business of the University of Cambridge with VAT registered number GB 823 8476 09. Our principal office is at University Printing House, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8BS, United Kingdom. Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorised to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[jats-list] JATS-List Guidelines, Tommie Usdin btusdin | Thread | Re: [jats-list] BITS: differences b, Pieter Lamers pieter |
[jats-list] JATS-List Guidelines, Tommie Usdin btusdin | Date | Re: [jats-list] BITS: differences b, Pieter Lamers pieter |
Month |