Re: [jats-list] BITS: differences between <back> and <book-back>

Subject: Re: [jats-list] BITS: differences between <back> and <book-back>
From: "Tommie Usdin btusdin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:07:35 -0000
Hi Mike b

In building BITS we considered <book-part> to be the closest equivalent
to a JATS <article>. The goal was to be able to make a JATS <article>
into a BITS <book-part> with minimal changes.


To put a data availability statement in a <book-part> you have a
<back> containing a <sec>, just like a JATS article.

If you are equating JATS <article> to <book> instead of to <book-part>
more changes will be needed. In this case, you would need a <book-back>
that contains <back> which contains <sec>.


The reason <book-back> was created, and has a different name from
<back>, is that it models a structure in books that has no equivalent
in articles.

Does that help?

b Tommie




> On Sep 27, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Mike Eden meden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks Pieter,
>
> While I can see that is a clear option, I was wondering why <sec> was not
provided here as per the <back> element as this would align more easily with
JATS content
>
>
>
> From: Pieter Lamers pieter.lamers@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 27 September 2018 15:53
> To: jats-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [jats-list] BITS: differences between <back> and <book-back>
>
>
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> shouldn't you put what you need in a book-back/book-part ? that would be the
most generic solution, I'd think.
>
> Best
> Pieter
>
> On 27/09/2018 16:31, Mike Eden meden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I just wondered what the rationale was in not allowing <sec> in <book-back>?
Was there a specific reason not to include it or was there no specific reason
to include it.
>
> I am wondering how to capture data-availability statement in BITS. In JATS I
would add as <back><sec content-type=bdata-availabilityb> alongside other
statements, acknowledgements, references etc. But where I would consider to
capture this statement for a whole book in <book-back> there is no child <sec>
or sibling of <ack>, <ref-list> etc.
>
>
>
> Am I looking at this right? Helpful comments please
>
>
>
> Mike Eden
>
>
>
> Cambridge University Press is the publishing business of the University of
Cambridge with VAT registered number GB 823 8476 09.  Our principal office is
at University Printing House, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8BS, United
Kingdom.
>
> Disclaimer
>
> The information contained in this communication from the sender is
confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others
authorised to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in
relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.
>
> JATS-List info and archive
>
> EasyUnsubscribe (by)
>
> --
> Pieter Lamers
> John Benjamins Publishing Company
> Postal Address: P.O. Box 36224, 1020 ME AMSTERDAM, The Netherlands
> Visiting Address: Klaprozenweg 75G, 1033 NN AMSTERDAM, The Netherlands
> Warehouse: Kelvinstraat 11-13, 1446 TK PURMEREND, The Netherlands
> tel: +31 20 630 4747
> web: www.benjamins.com
> JATS-List info and archive
>
> EasyUnsubscribe (by email)
>
> JATS-List info and archive
> EasyUnsubscribe (by email)

Current Thread