Subject: [jats-list] 4. The reason(s) you think JATS works From: "Alexander Schwarzman aschwarzman@xxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:29:43 -0000 |
To add to what's already been mentioned... 1) It seems to me, one of the less appreciated and apparent reasons that JATS works (or, in my opinion, is more successful than, let's say, TEI or DOCBOOK) is that in the STEM community, compared to the Social Sciences' or Humanities' communities, there have been (a) more consensus and (b) more support/accountability from funders . 2) Another -- more technical -- reason for JATS success is that it is seamlessly compatible with many technologies; most importantly, with the XML family of technologies, i.e., XSLT, Schematron, and XQuery. 3) Finally, the built-in customization design principle making it easy to create a tag subset or a tag superset was absolutely brilliant. I find the whole Swiftian Big-Endian/Little-Endian controversy about Greenification of Blue, JATS Lite, etc. quite amusing -- one can always create a subset that suits one's need. --Sasha Alexander ('Sasha') Schwarzman, Content Technology Architect phone: +1.202.416.1979 | e-mail: aschwarzman@xxxxxxx The Optical Society (OSA) 2010 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, DC 20036 USA www.osa.org
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[jats-list] Another reason that JAT, Beck, Jeff (NIH/NLM/ | Thread | [jats-list] Archive-It content in B, Ravit David ravit.da |
Re: [jats-list] JATS - Gripes and S, Debbie Lapeyre dalap | Date | Re: [jats-list] JATS-Con 2020 was t, Mark Donoghue m.dono |
Month |