Subject: Re: Requirements draft From: Stefan Mintert <mintert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 16:36:19 +0200 |
> I'm curious about one point: > > "User Defined Functions > > For reuse. Parameterized, but not recursive." > > Does anyone know what that means? Are we talking about a function call > mechansim *other than* the one defined in ECMAScript? and also different > from Flow Object Macros? > > -- > Paul Prescod - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco I'm interested in that too. And how will XSL which meets these requirements relate to DSSSL? The note from August (http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-XSL.html) reads: "... in parallel with the development of the XSL specification, a proposal for an amendment to DSSSL will be developed so that with the amendment it would be a superset of XSL. The amended standard would be compatible with current DSSSL but would have three kinds of additions..." I haven't found any statement like that in the new requirements draft. Did I miss anything? Bye, Stefan. +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Stefan Mintert UniDo: mintert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx private: stefan@xxxxxxxxxxx WWW: http://www.informatik.uni-dortmund.de/~sm/ +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "let the music keep our spirits high..." (Jackson Browne) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Requirements draft, Norman Walsh | Thread | Re: Requirements draft, Kent Fitch |
Re: XML + (XSL | CSS) ?, Daniel Glazman | Date | VRML and XSL, Amit Rekhi |
Month |