Subject: Re: Requirements draft From: Norman Walsh <ndw@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 12:19:55 -0400 |
/ Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> was heard to say: | For those who do not know, the new XSL requirements draft is at: | | http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-XSLReq | | It's going to be one hell of a language. I notice that it is supposed to | have a very compete set of features for both print and online. | | I hope it is built very incrementally because the world can't wait for the | Uber-stylesheet language. But I think that the participants know that. It's important to note that the requirements document intentionally casts an extremely wide net: ... [the requirements document] makes no statement about what specific requirements will be addressed in any particular Working Draft or version of XSL. In accordance with good language design practice, the full set of requirements are presented so that, at every step in the design process, design choices are made taking the full set of requirements into account, rather than just a subset of those requirements currently being met. It is the XSL WG's expectation that initial drafts/versions of XSL will address only a subset of these requirements. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Requirements draft, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: Requirements draft, Stefan Mintert |
Re: XML + (XSL | CSS) ?, Lisa Pease | Date | Re: XML + (XSL | CSS) ?, Lisa Pease |
Month |