Subject: Re: XML + (XSL | CSS) ? From: Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx> Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 21:24:16 +0200 |
Lisa Pease wrote: > XSL works in large part already via the msxsl control and processor. I guess I should point out that the current documentation for XSL is a NOTE, not yet a working draft, and that msxsl does not implement *any* of the actual flow objects in that note. Yes, XSL is way cool. But it isn't scheduled to be a Recommendation until July 1999 (current estimate), there is no up to date public specification at this point (due July 1998), and even the the old XSL note has not been implemented fully yet. Although actually the xslj implementation, together with Jade, is pretty good if you want static printed output. > HTML 4.0 and CSS1 aren't even fully implemented in the browsers. How long > will it be before the CSS2 recommendation is implemented in full? In full? Don't know. Currently around 50% of CSS2 is already implemented in major browsers and the rest has been implemented in assorted testbeds and proofs of concept. -- Chris XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XML + (XSL | CSS) ?, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: XML + (XSL | CSS) ?, Francois Belanger |
Re: XML + (XSL | CSS) ?, Chris Lilley | Date | Re: XML + (XSL | CSS) ?, Chris Lilley |
Month |