Re: XSL processors

Subject: Re: XSL processors
From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 13:43:24 -0400
Jeremy,

are you aware that the upcoming (end of July!!) release will produce MAJOR
syntax changes?

Frank


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy CALLES <Jeremy.Calles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, August 11, 1998 4:33 AM
Subject: Re: XSL processors


>Pasqualino "Titto" Assini wrote:
>>
>> I'm looking for a portable, open source, java XSL processor.
>>
>> I'm aware of the Microsoft processor but that's neither portable nor has
>> free source.
>>
>> I'm also aware of docproc, that has both but whose development seems to
>> proceed rather slowly.
>>
>> Is there any other alternative ?
>>
>> I can't believe that these are the only java XSL processors around.
>>
>
> I'm working on a java XSL processor, that will  be portable and free
>source.
>
>It's still in beta version but appears to works well. I think I will
>distribute it in 2 or 3 days, and make an announce in this mailling
>list.
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread