Subject: Re: XSL processors From: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 13:43:24 -0400 |
Jeremy, are you aware that the upcoming (end of July!!) release will produce MAJOR syntax changes? Frank -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy CALLES <Jeremy.Calles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tuesday, August 11, 1998 4:33 AM Subject: Re: XSL processors >Pasqualino "Titto" Assini wrote: >> >> I'm looking for a portable, open source, java XSL processor. >> >> I'm aware of the Microsoft processor but that's neither portable nor has >> free source. >> >> I'm also aware of docproc, that has both but whose development seems to >> proceed rather slowly. >> >> Is there any other alternative ? >> >> I can't believe that these are the only java XSL processors around. >> > > I'm working on a java XSL processor, that will be portable and free >source. > >It's still in beta version but appears to works well. I think I will >distribute it in 2 or 3 days, and make an announce in this mailling >list. > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL processors, Peter Murray-Rust | Thread | Question about patterns, cappers |
Re: XSL processors, Peter Murray-Rust | Date | Re: Question about patterns, John Eadie |
Month |