[no subject]

From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 23:21:21 +0800
I've already expressed my desire for a separate tree addressing language
usable by both XSL and XLink.

It occurs to me that maybe the formatting objects could be separate too.

I would actually like XSL to consist of three *separate* things:

1. Pattern Language for Tree Addressing
2. DTD and Specification of Formatting Objects
3. Specification for Stylesheets themselves, Tree Transforms, etc.

2 and 3 already use separate namespaces.

James Tauber / jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx      http://www.jtauber.com/
Lecturer and Associate Researcher
Electronic Commerce Network             ( http://www.xmlinfo.com/
Curtin Business School                  ( http://www.xmlsoftware.com/
Perth, Western Australia                ( http://www.schema.net/

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
  • [no subject]
    • James Tauber - Fri, 28 Aug 1998 23:21:21 +0800 <=