Subject: Re: syntax feedback From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 19:47:22 -0500 |
At 04:19 PM 12/13/98 -0600, Paul Prescod wrote: >So that's a data point from the low end and the very high end. XSL is >destined to be a runaway hit. Two data points are not statistically significant. Neither of course, are my four data points, all roughly united in saying "what is this <expletive deleted>?" regarding XSL. (Of course, they were from people who work with CSS on a daily basis.) The W3C has made some very strange moves, but putting CSS and XSL into direct competition is one of the strangest. I fear it may hobble both, as developers struggle over which to support with the most resources. XSL is more 'powerful' in that it provides transformation, but otherwise I'm afraid it's not that exciting - unless you've had experience with the tools that have inspired its particular direction of development. I'll stay out of the battle on particulars, but the mere fact that CSS and XSL are in direct contention is a matter for deep concern. Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer / Cookies Sharing Bandwidth Building XML Applications (February) http://www.simonstl.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: syntax feedback, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: syntax feedback, Robyn & John |
Re: An XSL SAX?, Chris Maden | Date | Links in XSL, Simon St.Laurent |
Month |