Subject: Re: syntax feedback From: Daniel GLAZMAN <daniel.glazman@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 10:15:47 +0100 |
Paul Prescod a écrit : > CSS does formatting, pattern matching and layout. Why not use it as it is? Yeah... So why does XSL reinvent the wheel and not reuse CSS selectors' syntax ? Why those ugly xsl:then and BLA $eq$ "sdfv" ? Why position qualifiers using negative integers in order to say 'last one' ? Berk !!!! CSS general syntax is also used by Cascading Action Sheets from Netscape, HTML Components (HTC) from Microsoft, and my personal proposal STTS which is a transformation language. CAS and HTC are harmonized in the CSS+FP WG and I'll have a first runnable full implem of STTS in february ; it will be of course freely available. CSS is not this small little thing for dummies which stands in a corner of the W3C web site. It is clearer, simpler than XSL is (as a member of W3C, I have access to XSL WG docs) and will be. It is extremely powerful and the selector's syntax is the first thing which is really new in the markup language world we have been exploring during 15 years (I am of course forgetting HyTime). Oh, BTW, I've shown examples of XSL to newbies and SGML users too. The result ? They hated it. Quotation : " looks like an hybrid of Perl, csh and SGML invented by a Microsoft employee " :-))) </Daniel> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: syntax feedback, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: syntax feedback, Paul Prescod |
Re: XSL intent survey, Oren Ben-Kiki | Date | Re: syntax feedback, Oren Ben-Kiki |
Month |