Re: syntax feedback

[Tony Graham <tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 15 Dec 1998 05:13 -0800, Toivo Lainevool wrote:
 > Isn't SGML/DSSSL for the serious print applications?  I thought
 > XML/XSL was supposed to be "SGML Lite".  SGML/DSSSL can be used for
 > the "serious" people and XML/XSL will be for the masses.

Two of the non-normative design principles of XSL (Appendix D) are:

 - XSL should support browsing, printing, and interactive editing and
   design tools
...
 - XSL should provide the formatting functionality of at least DSSSL
   and CSS


I expect a lot of serious XML users want to use their XML for both
print and display, plus I expect that people's perception of what's
"good enough" when printing something that they got off the Web will
change over time, rather like dot-matrix wasn't "good enough" after
laser printers with scalable fonts became widely available.

Regards,


Tony Graham
======================================================================
Tony Graham                            mailto:tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9632
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list